At one time, monthly TV subscription fees were the foundation of a small but stable business. The owner of a local cable network knew every household, negotiated directly with residents, ran lines to their homes, assembled a team of technicians, and spent years answering customer calls.
Today, TV subscriptions are becoming less and less profitable. But the business itself hasn't disappeared without a trace.
The wires are still there. The people who know how to maintain them are still there. Access to people’s homes is still there. Knowledge of the neighborhood remains—including the best routes to take, who to contact, and how to fix a problem quickly. Finally, there’s something that can’t be bought along with new equipment: the trust of hundreds of customers.
The question isn't just about how to continue making money from the old network. The question runs deeper: what role can its owner retain for himself in the new digital economy?
Income has declined, but what matters most remains the same
It's easy to view the local cable network as a relic of a bygone era. As people pay less and less for traditional television, it may seem that the lines running to their homes are gradually losing their significance.
But it is the service that may become obsolete, not necessarily the physical means by which it was delivered.
When a local entrepreneur built the network, he wasn't just creating a way to broadcast TV channels. He actually brought the neighborhood together: he reached out to homes, set up connections, established customer service, compiled a list of customer contacts, and built working relationships with people.
For a new entrant, all of this still lies ahead. But the local cable provider already has actual infrastructure—not just on paper or in plans, but right out on the streets and in people’s homes.
The problem with this kind of business is often not that it has nothing left. The problem is that the previous way of using this resource no longer works as it used to.
This is an important distinction. It changes the very nature of the question about the future.
A Familiar Fork in the Road
One obvious path is to transform a local business into a full-fledged Internet service provider on your own. This allows you to maintain control over the network and customer relationships. But at the same time, the owner must take on a whole new level of challenges. It’s no longer enough to simply know your neighborhood well and keep the lines in working order. You have to build a larger digital business all on your own.
Another common option is to partner with a large company. The local owner provides the company with access to the last mile, connects households, maintains the lines, and receives a share of the revenue.
There is a clear logic to this model as well. A large operator brings scale, a well-known brand, and a unified system. However, the role of the local entrepreneur may gradually diminish. He no longer determines what the chain will look like or how it will develop. His outlets become part of someone else’s business, and he himself becomes merely an operator in his own territory.
It comes down to a tough choice: either try to grow into a large company on your own, or gain access to its resources by ceding a significant amount of control to it.
But what if this map is incomplete?
Not just what to sell, but who to be
Usually, the search for a new path begins with the question: What other services can be delivered over existing lines?
This is a straightforward approach, but it keeps the focus on the product. Meanwhile, another question is just as important for the owner of a local network: What role will he play after the changes?
Will he be the independent operator of a functioning infrastructure? Or will he become part of a team that maintains a section of a large system owned by someone else?
The difference here isn’t in the job title. It concerns the very foundation of the business. In the first case, a person retains control of their own physical resources and shares in the income that those resources help generate. In the second, the primary focus is on performing work for whoever controls the entire system.
Until recently, it might have seemed that scale and independent ownership were incompatible. A large company builds a large network, while smaller players either compete with it individually or join on its terms.
But digital networks offer yet another approach.
Scale without giving up your own network
Suppose that several independent owners of local infrastructure do not sell their networks or transfer them to a single central operator. Each retains its own lines, its own territory, and its own relationships with customers.
At the same time, their resources are connected via a shared digital core and begin to function as part of a broader infrastructure.
One participant provides physical access to homes in his neighborhood. Another does the same in a neighboring town. A third connects a resource he owns in another region. Individually, they remain local entrepreneurs. Together, their physical capabilities form a larger-scale network.
This is where the third option comes into play.
You don't have to choose between being a standalone provider and being a contractor for a large company. You can keep your last mile and become the owner of a valuable part of the shared digital network.
In a model like this, scale is achieved through collaboration. It does not require a single local entrepreneur to build the entire system from scratch. Nor does it necessarily mean that ownership of the local network must be transferred to a larger entity.
The cables leading to homes continue to belong to those who installed and maintained them. But now they can be useful not only as a channel for traditional television subscriptions. They are becoming part of an infrastructure made up of a multitude of tangible resources owned by independent owners.
Not a contractor on its own premises
For a local cable installer, the practical significance of this idea is quite simple.
His value lies not only in his ability to come out, connect a customer, or fix a problem. His main contribution is the network he owns: the physical infrastructure, the team, his on-site presence, and his connection to the community.
Within the overall infrastructure, he can earn compensation not just for completing an order, but for the valuable work his resource provides. He remains a participant in the network, rather than merely a support staff member working alongside it.
This does not mean a return to the past under a new name. On the contrary, it refers to a new role for what has already been built.
The “last mile” is no longer seen as a burdensome remnant of the television business. It is once again becoming the foundation of independence—only now it is not isolated, but integrated into a broader system.
This is also changing our perception of scale. In the past, scale was almost inevitably associated with a single large owner. Now, large-scale digital infrastructure can be viewed as a collection of parts, each of which belongs to its own participant and performs a real function.
Digital infrastructure can be owned by many
There is a broader concept behind this model.
Digital networks do not necessarily have to be wholly owned by a few large companies. Ordinary entrepreneurs who already have useful physical resources—such as lines, equipment, sites, power, and connections to a specific area—can participate in their creation.
Each of these resources may be small on its own. But a digital system can bring together many such contributions and turn them into a functioning infrastructure.
For the owner of a local cable network, this represents a significant shift in how they view their business. Their asset isn’t just a bunch of old wires for which they need to urgently figure out what else to sell. It’s a part of the physical world that belongs to them and can be useful to the new digital economy.
Perhaps the future of his business lies not between complete independence and subordination to a large company. Perhaps it lies in collaboration with other independent business owners—without losing his own role.
Wires that run forward
A local cable installer has already done the hard part. He came to the neighborhood, made his way to the homes, set up the network, put together a team, and earned the trust of the people.
The old television business model is declining, but everything that has been created over the years does not have to decline along with it. The physical network can find a new place in the world—it can become a part of a larger digital infrastructure owned by its proprietor.
This offers a new perspective not only on the cable business, but also on the structure of modern networks in general. Who owns them? How do independent participants pool their resources? How does an ordinary physical asset begin to function within a shared digital system and generate revenue for its owner?
Именно этот новый мир инфраструктурных сетей открывает GUIDE to DePIN WORLD — чтобы увидеть, как ресурсы независимых владельцев складываются в нечто большее, не переставая принадлежать тем, кто их создал.
А если в таком локальном бизнесе уже есть вычислительное оборудование или планируется его добавить, калькулятор доходности DePIN-сервера позволяет оценить экономику конкретной конфигурации.
Explore more on DePIN World →